Saturday, February 09, 2013

Another Suspicious Statistic from Parents for Megan’s Law

I have written previously about how the organization, Parents for Megan’s Law, has used distorted and misleading statistics. They have been in the news recently about this. I decided to explore another statistic they have referenced: “The average serial child molester has between 360-380 victims in his lifetime.” The source of that statistic seems to be South Carolina Forcible Sex Crimes. (1999). Summary, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Columbia, SC. (That reference is listed at the bottom of the page).

That statement and indicated source is all over the Internet. The trouble comes when you actually try to find the source document. One finds that the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division does publish an annual Crime in South Carolina Book in which they report the yearly statistics for various categories. The first year for which this annual compilation is available is indeed 1999. The difficulty deepens when one finds that this  document does not have a category for “Forcible Sex Crimes.” It does have a category for rape and a category for “Other Forcible Sex Crimes.” When one looks up that section, there is no “Summary” which includes the statement, The average serial child molester has between 360-380 victims in his lifetime.” There also is no way to compile such a statistic from the data presented.

This is not surprising. This report relates the number of crimes reported in a given year. It would be very strange indeed if it reported a number of victims in a lifetime for a “serial child molester.”

If there is a document which contains such a statement which has been published by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, I have been unable to find it, and I have very good research skills. (If anyone can find such a document, please send it to me, and I will provide it here).

I did try to find another primary source for this statistic. A good number of websites contain a similar statement: "An average serial child molester may have as many as 400 victims in his lifetime." Some listed as their source,  Elliott, M.,Browne, K., & Kilcoyne, J. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: what offenders tell us. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 579 –594. Being the diligent researcher that I am, I paid the $31 and purchased the article.

Not at all I strangely (I am coming to expect this), the article did not contain that statement or any statement that could be legitimately interpreted in that way. The study of 91 interviewed offenders did contain this statement: “70% of the men had committed offenses against 1 to 9 victims, 23% had committed offenses against 10 to 40 children, 7% had committed offenses against 41 to 450 children. However, it should be pointed out that the 7% of offenders who reported a high number of victims gave a different high figure when interviewed 6 months later" (p. 584). That is a long way from the statement, "An average serial child molester may have as many as 400 victims in his lifetime."

What is one to make of all of this? For one, it is certainly clear that there are a lot of “funny” numbers out there when it comes to the problem of child sexual abuse. Those who offer such statistics apparently have never checked them out themselves or perhaps hoped that no one else would. They are probably right in that latter assumption. When it comes to statistics, most people's eyes just glaze over. Meanwhile, these funny numbers are used to boost a veritable “sex offender industry” that costs taxpayers millions of dollars.

The one statistic that doesn’t get much play is an indisputable one. In New York State, 96% of those arrested for sex crimes have never previously been convicted of a sex crime and thus are not listed on any registry (see also The New York Office of Sex Offender Management "Myths and Facts"). This means that the millions of dollars spent tracking registered sex offenders will not and indeed cannot make a dent in the problem of child sexual abuse.

Note: Parents for Megan's Law is not the only part of the "sex offender industry" to benefit financially from hyping the danger with "funny" numbers. See my blog on Watch Systems, Inc. 


Anonymous said...

What exactly is "An average serial child molester"?

Anonymous said...

I hope all sex offenders die horriibly and wish that awful things happen to you for having this website. Do us all a favor and please kill yourself.

Anonymous said...

Suspicious is the fact that the fox is being put in charge of watching the chickens. I think someone needs to follow the money on this one, something stinks and I can smell it and I'm a couple states west of New York.

researching sex offender said...

oh my - so many hateful know it's really easy to be wrongly charged with a sex they deserve to be punished too?

binh nguyen said...

tội phạm tình dục giờ đặc biệt nguy hiểm, nó làm cho xã hội ngày càng tồi tệ và xấu đi.
truyen sex, truyen sex

teresa bowen said...

There are lots of health supplements which help to increase testosterone levels but need to make sure that it is safe and effective.

zinc testosterone

B.S Bisht said...

This is what I was looking for from last week. Great work done. :)

Sex offenders

Registered sex offenders

california sex offenders

California Sex Offender Registry

Anonymous said...

nice post & visit me. Live free friends and romance chat rooms

Anonymous said...

People are just plain ignorant because they aren't educated enough on what a "chuld molester" is. You have Pedofiles and others in that group. Someone can be labeled a molester and never molest, it's plain ignorant of the public that a lot are being over charged on crimes and thrown in the same group as muderers and obvious mental people. Instead of providing treatment to an obvious condition brought on by mainly (and most probably) they themselves bein molested at some point. It's a viscous circle and can only be broke. With treatment, help and support. Throwing away the key is not the answer!

Anonymous said...

I wish I could find the article I read recently that stated new findings reveal that, in general, pornography offenders do not have histories with abusing or being abused, while hands-on offenders, generally, have no history with pornography issues... thus debunking a long-held myth that pornography is the "gateway drug" to physical / sexual abuse.

Anonymous said...

The latest studies have correlated the "amount" of porn images possessed has a direct link to the amount of "live victims"..Age seems to be a factor in the victim count also.

David Hess said...

I am unaware of any such study. Please provide a link.

Anonymous said...

if an "average" one has 360 victims how many do the "great" ones have 30,000-40,000? and where do they find the time??


@=>Indian Bangla Hot Desi 3x Sex Xxx 3gp mp4 HD Video Free <=@

»1. Porn Teen Videos - Sex Tube, Young XXX Movies, Teenage

»2. XNXX.COM: Free Porn, Sex, Tube Videos, XXX Pics, Pussy

»3. Indian Video Songs - Android Apps on Google Play


»5. Free Sex Videos,Mobile Sex 3gp mp4 XXX Videos Movies

»6. Hot Pakistani Girl Zainab Ali Leaked Sex Video www.asian

@=>Xnxx Video Download - Free Mp3 Download - Downloads<=@

»7. Amateur Girls Sex Videos - Teen & Milf Wife Cum Shots

»8. Free Asian Porn Movies - hot asian sex, sexy asian girls

»9. School Girl Sex With Teacher Bathroom MMS-Indian Girls

»10. Indian Teen schoolgirl homemade sex scandal - XVIDEOS ...

»11. Girl2Sex Full Indian Girls Sex Videos Free Downloads :

»12. Sunny Leone Hot Videos, Sunny Leone Sex Videos ,Sunny

»13. Sexy Sunny Leone - Free Porn Videos - YouPorn xnxx video,porn

Anonymous said...

The "Salem Witch Trials" of 1692 and the "Nuremberg Laws" passed by the Nazi Party against the Jews in 1933, to me best fits the components Megan's Law, Jessica's Law, Adam Walsh's Law and all the other designer laws pertaining to sex offenses. But believe me, I am not a proponent of people who commit sex crimes, indeed, those who commit such crimes are better treated in the criminal justice system then I would treat them; however, I am a strong believer in the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights. Particularly the to 14th Amendment Right to Due Process which, from studying various state sex offender laws, tells me that no such Right exist for those people subject to these laws. That to me is a GIANT RED FLAG! Martin Luther King Jr once said..."Injustice anywhere is Injustice Everywhere..." In other words, the whole of America could be subject to the whims of irresponsible laws passed by a rouge state or federal legislature backed up by a rouge U.S. Supreme Court. Ponder this if you will: I believe sex offendder laws are pre-curser laws designed to open the door to more Draconian laws that willbe applied to all US citizens later in the future. Think people.

abdul mannan said...

.>>---------xx24xx.cumshot sex (107)

.>>----------blowjob sex (311)

.>>----------Hot sites (311)

.>>----------sex in office (534)

.>>----------Teen sex (345)

.>>----------pornstar sex (345)

.>>----------hardcore sex (911)

.>>----------European sex (211)

.>>----------big tits sex (421)

.>>----------pornstar sex (214)

.>>----------Lesbian sex (532)

.>>----------Hot dick sex (111)

.>>----------big tits sex (421)

.>>----------porn video sex (651)

.>>----------fuck video sex (111)

.>>----------xmovie sex sex (741)

.>>----------lesbian sex video (311)

.>>----------sex video free (311)

.>>----------HD video sex (511)

.>>----------Free sex move xx24xx (621)

Joe DuBois said...

It HAS begun and now the registry MUST GO!
Here is you official chance to take your stand and take it down! 

The WAR Admin Team AND our Class Action Core Team are proud to announce that we will begin work this week on two law suits to be filed at the federal level this fall. That’s right – two of them!

The first is on behalf of registered sex offenders and the second on behalf of families and friends of registered sex offenders.

The challenges will be against SORNA and the impact to the registrant families, which has been verified and documented by researchers. Also, the public impact will be defined in an upcoming survey being developed with the assistance of Professor Crysanthi Leon of the University of Delaware.

Even though these laws were mandated at the Congressional level then enacted to varying degrees by the state legislatures, we will be asking the court to rule on “the law” thus removing the manner in which legislators have purported to keep children safe – punitive punishment for registrants and families. It is time to take the issue out of the state legislators hands and campaigns and place it firmly in front of the supreme courts.

The concept of filing based on the collateral damage experienced by those who seek to provide positive support at re-entry and thereafter will gather steam and provide a more assertive approach than is being used today.

Please consider this your invitation to visit our website where you will instantly see the announcement as well as the opportunity for participation. We have also listed some Frequently Asked Questions to help answer as many immediate questions as possible.

Join the ‘Movers and Shakers’ in these law suits.

Anonymous said...

Not necessarily. Perhaps for some "dual offenders" there is a link, but obviously not for porn-only offenders. In fact, obsessive-compulsive collecting traits, seen in many with the CP population, can also explain high counts, not to mention technology itself.

Anonymous said...

When it's your child or grandchild on the list, would you be saying the same thing? What makes you think your family are immune?

Joe said...

There is another aspect to the statistics that are cultivated and used; that most readers do not realize.

1. It is a crime to discuss NOT TO REPORT someone who confides illegal sexual activity (sex with a child; crimes against children, etc.). Therefore NO ONE who is not in jail is not going to admit it to a therapist because he/she will go to jail.

2. SO the only people who CAN talk are in JAIL ALREADY. And chances are, the ones willing to talk are the truly bad apples that have committed many acts. And in most cases I would assume, they are talking because they are never getting out.

My point is -- the statistics are wrong; they are skewed. We need to remove the reporting requirements and begin studying the real problem -- which are the ones who did not get caught.

But fear keeps us from doing that. :(